|
Quaker Life
August/September 2002
350 Years of Quakerism
Now What?
Shine For Christ
By Ron Selleck
High Point Friends, North Carolina
One of the truest things Rufus Jones said was that "Just
keeping the flickering flame of Quakerism alive for one more generation"
is too small an aim. Such a goal will leave us spiritually famished and
will not call forth our best efforts on behalf of a lost and dying world.
The recent history of the Society of Friends has been the
story of overall decline. Rufus Jones, in his own efforts to bring life,
unwittingly contributed to this decline by driving a wedge in the crack
that already existed in Quaker theology between religious experience and
revelation, between the Light and the historic Jesus Christ, between the
human Jesus and the Christ of faith. His heirs have carried these tendencies
further than he ever could have imagined or countenanced.
The most devastating consequence of this interpretation
of Quakerism as a species of mysticism is that, in seeking the Light,
we have rejected the Word. We daily demonstrate our hostility to the grace
of Christ by our hearty embrace of whatever human-made schemes for fulfillment
or alternative "spirituality" the winds of time and fashion
blow our way. Breathlessly pursuing whatever fad comes along, we imagine
we are just one self-help group away from fulfillment. However, we are
leaky buckets, never filled. We seek happiness by trying to satisfy our
wants but we do not want what satisfies. We have become too smart for
a salvation that provides no basis for self-congratulation. Having rejected
the Word made flesh, we have rejected God's breath, or Spirit, as well.
God's breath and God's speech are never separated. No amount of recounting
our "faith experiences" can move us one inch closer to God.
We cannot get to God by speaking of humanity in a loud voice. We only
know God as God has drawn near to us in Christ.
A detailed account of our decline is possible, but it would
only lead to further paralysis. The key to the future for the Society
of Friends is very simpleit comes down to the basic question of
identity. Shall we go forward as the Church, a living branch of the body
of Christ, or shall we descend further into religious clannishness? "A
voluntary association of those with similar views about religion"
as the old Five Years Meeting discipline put it, describes a cult, not
the Church. If we Friends are content to pride ourselves upon our alleged
unique human insights, our future is the same as that of all human-made
religionsperpetual crisis.
Religions are always more or less sick. They face a perpetual
crisis of fresh recruits and fresh funds. Like other merely human organizations,
they are born and, they die. There was a time when Quakerism was not,
and, if it is merely another religion, there will be a time when it will
not be again. Its god will die for lack of human support.
However, the Church endures forever because it is founded
on Christ's promise to Peter. The real God does not need our support,
but we need God, the same God who has uniquely revealed himself in the
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and whom Jesus addressed as Father.
The Church knows no other God than this one. We do not sustain the Church;
the Church sustains us. It was here when we were born and it will still
be here when we are gone, in spite of our best efforts to improve it.
The Church is not in danger of collapse. However, we as
Friends are in danger, as is Western secular society as a whole. God is
still looking for a people who are open to his Word. If we are no longer
such a people, God will not die, we will. Our circumstances may be gloomy,
but no special circumstances are required to live the Christian life.
We must aim to live as people of faith wherever we are and proclaim the
mighty works of God in word and deed in whatever circumstances we find
ourselves. The possibility always remains that our weaknesses may become
occasions for Christ to glorify himself, if only we receive them as opportunities
to rely more fully on God.
"In the midst of a crooked and perverse generation..."
shine for Christ.
(Philippians 2:15)
Remember Three Things
By Tom Hamm
New Castle Friends, Indiana
After 350 years, we Friends have much on which to congratulate
ourselves. Out of all proportion to our tiny numbers, we helped the world
see the evil of slavery, helped it recognize the wisdom of not subordinating
and disenfranchising people just because of their gender, and helped to
set higher standards for justice for all people. Our attempts at service
have saved countless lives and relieved the suffering of many others.
And in the 20th century, Quakerism spread literally around the world;
Friends worldwide are far more representative of the worldÕs population
than we were 100 years ago, as well as being more numerous. I expect some
other answers to this question will emphasize our problems, and they are
real: declining membership in some yearly meetings, an uncertain identity,
a tendency toward internal strife. But these are not new, and should not
distract us from what we have every right to celebrate.
My advice for Friends now? Three things.
First, remember that God is timeless. The same power that
George Fox and Margaret Fell and others of the first generation of Friends
knew still works in the world today. The transforming power of the Light
of Christ Within not only showed early Friends their need for a Savior,
but served as their Inward Teacher, and that Inward Teacher set them on
a course that would create a powerful religious movement. That power is
accessible to us when we seek it. As we do so, however, we need to keep
in mind that it may work in unexpected ways, and we need to be open to
its new leadings. That can be dangerous; there is always the possibility
of confusing our own desires with its leadings. But we have the necessary
checks in Scripture, the experiences and accumulated wisdom of Friends
over 350 years and the Spirit working through the gathered meeting.
Second, be consistent. My personal Quaker pet peeve is how
far too many contemporary Friends set up what they pronounce absolute,
fundamental, uncompromising standards for defining Quakerism and then
proceed to compromise them. It's true of both liberal and evangelical
Friends. If some Friends want to make the Richmond Declaration of Faith
the definition of a consistent Quaker, then letÕs embark on that experiment.
First, let yearly meetings put that explicitly in their Faith and Practices.
Then, let them hold to the whole thing, including its statements on peace
and the ministry of women. At the other extreme, if the hallmark of Quakerism
is to be welcoming and tolerant of diversity, then let's embrace diversity,
including Friends who speak openly of how their experience of Christ has
transformed and shaped their lives, or those who see opposition to abortion
as an implication of the Peace Testimony.
Third, beware of seeing change in structures as the solution
to problems whose roots are not organizational. I had no use for the Realignment
proposals of a decade ago, not because I thought bad motives lay behind
them, but because I am convinced that Quaker history shows us they would
not work. The Hicksite Separation of 1827-1828 began when John Comly and
other leading Philadelphia Hicksites left their yearly meeting, apparently
convinced that a temporary withdrawal would lessen tensions and then they
would return. That took 128 years. After that separation, within a generation,
both Hicksite and Orthodox Friends had experienced a new round of separations
that added Gurneyite, Wilburite and Progressive to the Quaker lexicon.
The Five Years Meeting (now FUM) was formed in 1902 in large part to bring
together most Friends under a Uniform Discipline that was supposed to
promote unity. Yet, almost immediately, it was torn by strife, the consequences
of which are still with us. Organizations do many good things, and there
may be good reasons to reorganize them, but they do not bring unity to
Friends. Unity is born of the Spirit of God working among us.
Unlike some Friends, I am not convinced I will see the end
of Quakerism in my lifetime. I see too many signs of life. But I think
we will come closer to realizing the vision God has for us if we act consistently
and are mindful of the lessons of our history.
Quakerism as a Spiritual Movement
By Michael Hatfield
Austin Christian Friends, Texas
Do you love me?... Feed my sheep.
ÑJohn 21:17
Lake Shore Baptist Church in Waco, Texas, offers a "Friends
Class" Sunday school. Attenders meet in waiting worship before the
Sunday morning congregational service and then meet mid-week to study
peace issues.
These Baptists are nourished through Quaker doctrines and
worship. They are nourished through truths available to all, but, in either
theology or practice, neglected or rejected by most Christians: Jesus
Christ's being present to teach his people himself, the testimony against
war and its seeds, and the transforming reality of spiritual communion
and baptism.
These Christian truths embraced by Friends are neglected
or rejected by other Christians. By our modern sensibilities, it is shocking
to see how early Friends challenged Christians who neglected or rejected
these truths. But these challenges must be seen in the light of love.
Early Friends left Anglican, Presbyterian, Baptist, Puritan
and other congregations in search of a more fulfilling relationship with
Christ. Their experience of direct spiritual communion with Christ's living
presence revealed the creeds, forms and rituals they left behind as substitutes
for his living presence. They wanted to be possessed by their Lord Jesus
who gathered them in his presence, not merely verbally professing him
to be their Lord. They wanted to reach others who were lost in substitutes,
professing Christ but not allowing his living presence to possess their
lives.
Early Friends knew that merely professing Christ without
being possessed by him is spiritually dangerous because it is spiritually
unfulfilling. Unfulfilled, the mere verbal professorÕs attentiveness turns
from Christ, either by losing all spiritual hope or by becoming lost in
substitutes for Christ's living presence. Today, as 350 years ago, those
substitutes include tradition, theology, community building, emotions,
ideas, politics, moralizing, good works and an intellectual fascination
with Biblical words, themes and principles. Although useful for Christ's
work, any of them can become a substitute for attentiveness to his living
presence.
Quakerism began as a spiritual movement among Christians
seeking a more fulfilling relationship with the living and present Christ,
a relationship free of substitutes. Today Christians remain who verbally
profess Christ but who, being lost in substitutes for his living presence,
are spiritually unfulfilled. Early Friends preached the truth of Christ's
living presence, a truth neglected or rejected by the theology or practice
of other Christians but essential to their spiritual fulfillment. Are
we willing to preach and live that truth? Early Friends were imprisoned
for it.
Early Friends preached that being still and attentive to
the Light of Christ's living presence was the first step to spiritual
fulfillment, possession by Christ. In stillness, the Light shows us our
sins, but also shows us Christ's powerfully loving presence. It is only
with the knowledge of both that we can begin giving our whole lives to
Christ, who, in turn, will use us to manifest his presence, power and
love in the world. This is how we are fulfilled. It is our purpose in
being. Christians today still need this essential truth, and we remain
obligated to share it. In the Light of Christ's living presence, the attractiveness
of all substitutes evaporates. Knowing the truth frees us from the slavery
of substitution.
The most important future of Quakerism may be the future
among other Christians of the truths we embrace and they need in order
to be free. When the concerns of early Friends no longer included the
spiritual needs of other Christians, the spiritual decline of Quakerism
began. There have been attempts to reverse that decline, but none has
caused a revival of Quakerism as a spiritual movement. Perhaps it is because
none has yet included the spiritual needs of other Christians.
How can Friends today express concern for other Christians'
spiritual need for Christ's living presence? What would Quakerism as a
21st century spiritual movement look like? Quaker house churches? Waiting
worship in Baptist Sunday schools? Interdenominational waiting worship
groups in our homes? Prayer, study and support groups for those wanting
to live our testimonies of peace, simplicity, equality and integrity?
Using our denomination's resources to reach those in other denominations?
What that movement might look like is not as important as our being open
to it, regardless of what it looks like.
If we are to have a future as Jesus' Friends, we must feed
his sheep. And his sheep can be nourished only through his living presence.
Vision, Prayerful Study and Zeal
By Wellington W. Whittlesey
St. Petersburg Theological Seminary, Florida;
College Avenue Friends, Oskaloosa, Iowa
When George Fox and the early Friends gathered, there was
no program designed for their meetings, but there was a sense of urgency
in proclaiming the glorious message God had imparted to them, an expectancy
the Holy Spirit would continue to fire their lives with zeal and a recognition
He was guiding their every movement.
Charles Wesley later stated that, had the Quakers continued
to be true to their Calling, there would be no room for the Methodist
movement. However, the Quietist Period had set in, and, I'm sorry to relate,
it has not fully dissipated yet. Quiet waiting there must be; the "Sense
of the Meeting" must be discovered and approved before running off
in every direction. Gentleness is more required in our day than almost
any other quality we emphasize; the problem is not that we are too patient,
but that we are not zealous. Early Quakerism was the movement of
the Spirit upon the faithful. Present Quakerism is the quiet, refined,
orthodox, staid, settled movement of the elitemore concerned for
Society than it is for the slighted.
What must we do to regain the reason for the high
respect Quakerism holds in the minds of the thoughtful?
First, we must see our own age not through the eyes of the
common 21st century believer; we have been doing that too long already.
We must see it as God sees ita soul-starved, holiness-hungry, world-warped
flood of humanity, many who have never heard the name of Jesus, who are
physically starving and in dread of their lives. Our next-door neighbors
are living in luxury physically, and dying in misery spiritually, because
we complacently accept the illusion that, since they go to their church,
they receive all that God has for them. Either Friends have the real
thing to offer, or we have nothing to offer.
Second, we must learn to read and memorize Scripture and
pray as our foreparents did. Why did they not carry their (physical) Bibles
to Meeting? Because it was hidden in their minds. Why did they sit expectantly
in gathered meeting? Because they knew the Holy Spirit would answer
their prayers and guide their daily walk. For them, service began when
meeting was over. Rather than ask why more people are not attracted to
Friends, we should be asking how we retain so many in our fellowship?
Now what? Expect much from God who has called us.
Third, we must take a lesson from our newer yearly meetings.
Do you ever wonder why there are almost as many Friends in East Africa
as there are in all the rest of the world combined? It could
be that they have not yet forgotten the reason for our Society.
Three great Commandments Jesus gave us, only threeÑlove the Lord your
God, love one another and go into all the world and proclaim the
gospel.
Now, if this sounds too prosaic, just recall that in the
first century and the 17th century, it was the simplicity of this message
that brought God's light into the world in a new and transforming manner.
I have suggested just three things: vision, prayerful study and zeal.
Although the order may not be correct, we shall be renewed if we take
seriously the purpose God has for us. We must be cooperative with all
who name the name of our Lord and we must be as cooperative with
the One who has called us. We do have a message that is much needed.
We do have a task that needs to be accomplished.
But we must focus anew. We must be more concerned with the
"Why" in our meetings than with the "How." If someone
should stand up and shout, would it disrupt meeting? If the shout is in
adoration of the Lord, it certainly should not; but in most of our meetings,
I'm afraid it would. Early Friends not only shoutedthey also shook.
But now, when I am termed a "Quaker," folks properly wonder
why!
Laurels are wonderful, but not to be rested upon.
Please God, Give Us Graced Wisdom
By Dean Freiday
Manasquan Friends, New Jersey
Whether you view the "Now What" portion of our
topic with anticipation or somewhat antagonistically, it raises some major
questions for Friends.
How many of us have really thought through the basic beliefs
that identify us? What, for example, is a liberal Friend? What about those
who claim the right to believe what they please, as long as there are
potluck meals and social action of one kind or another?
John Punshon's Reasons for Hope lovingly, yet critically,
calls the Friends Church to reclaim the central thrust of open worship
and urges them to remember and reassert the Quaker part of being evangelical.
He doesn't take up the mega-church movement of Southwest Yearly Meeting,
more akin to Robert Schuller's Crystal Cathedral than Quakerism.
Are British Friends still Quaker? If so, which kind of a
half-a-dozen varieties? And worldwide, why are only the mission Quakers
growing, while most others, even evangelicals in the U.S., are shrinking
in membership?
FUM rightly held its Triennial in Kenya, where there are
now more Friends than all varieties together in the U.S. How long before
Kenya starts to missionize the U.S.? That might be our salvation in more
senses of that word than one.
Thirty-two years after the St. Louis Faith and Life Conference
has there been any real coming together of Friends in the United States?
My wife, Sandy, says the distinctive aspect of Quakerism
is its concern for other peoplelocally, nationally and universally.
For example, New Jersey Quaker Alice Paul's Equal Rights Amendment in
1982 failed ratification by only one of the States required for its adoption,
after a 10-year-long struggle to obtain passage. Its rejection left great
inequalities for women untouched. Most other denominations are still struggling
over ordaining women. Friends have not picked up the leftover challenges
in this area of human rights.
Most importantly, the Testimony that brackets us with the
other "historic peace churches" needs clarification and implementation
as never before. "Stamp out terrorism" as the only clearly enunciated
aspect of our so-called foreign policy leaves nuclear, ecological, impoverishment
and overpopulation issues still festering.
With global warming, nuclear chain reaction threats and
denial of economic and human rights, we may be nearing destruction of
all our technological progress; our lone superpower strategies are risky
indeed.
Please God, give us allQuakers and Christians of all
varieties, people of other faiths and nonesome Graced Wisdom, or
there won't be much of a future for Friends or hardly anyone else.
Excited To Be a Friend
By Doug Shoemaker
Westfield Friends, Indiana
Several years ago I received an interesting phone call asking
about the church where I served as pastor. "Is your church like the
Sheridan Friends Church?" was the question I was asked. The caller
on the other end had recently moved out of Sheridan and had a positive
experience with the Friends Meeting there. She wanted to know if we were
"like them." I was sure we weren't. No two churches are alike,
but I didn't tell her that. What I suggested was that she come and see
for herself.
One of the hot topics around here recently has been the
variety of beliefs and practices that are present among different groups
of Friends. This diversity among present-day Quakers is delightful to
some and terribly frustrating to others. Encountering many Friends who
are "different" has caused me to look carefully at our historical
and biblical roots and cautiously evaluate my own beliefs.
I'm happy to report that after doing so I'm more excited
than ever to be a part of the Society of Friends. We are part of a spiritual
movement that has been a witness of Christ Jesus for 350 years. We have
been among the first to speak out against slavery, to advocate prison
reform and to pioneer treatment, not punishment, of the mentally ill.
We have a reputation for recognizing the value and gifts of women and
have also been a friend to Native Americans. Jesus said, "Blessed
are the peacemakers," and peacemaking is also a valued part of our
heritage.
From "The Friendly Persuader" Newsletter, June
2002.
Copyright (c) 2002 Friends United Meeting
Return to August/September 2002 Contents page
|