|
A Guide for Friends on Conscientious Objection to War
PART 1: Is it ever right to go to war? PART 11: What if there is a draft?" Ben Richmond Friends United Meeting
That which is set up by the sword
is held up by the sword. .... The days of virtue, love and
peace are coming, George Fox, 1652
PART 1: Is it ever right to go to war? The quick answer is "no!" Individual Friends disagree about almost everything, including war and peace. Nevertheless, the official position of Friends is to be found in the book of Faith and Practice (Discipline) of each Yearly Meeting, and they all state that Christians should not participate in war. Many of the Yearly Meetings which are members of Friends United Meeting include the Richmond Declaration of Faith (1887) in their books of Faith and Practice. It has a section on "Peace," which reads:
We would, in humility, but in faithfulness to our Lord, express our firm persuasion that all the exigencies of civil government and social order may be met under the banner of the Prince of Peace, in strict conformity with His commands. (1)
Should people follow their conscience-to join the military or not? The story is told that after William Penn became a Friend, he asked George Fox whether he could continue to wear his sword. Fox answered, "I advise thee to wear it as long as thou canst." Soon after this Fox saw Penn without his sword, and Penn explained, "I have taken thy advice; I wore it as long as I could. (2) Friends believe that everyone must follow their own conscience. Friends also know that the conscience can be distorted by culture and imperfect human thought and is not always right. Friends have always used the Bible and the wisdom of the community of faith to help fellow Christians inform their consciences. In the Declaration of 1660, the most f amous statement of the peace testimony, early Friends used the Bible to help clarify how Christ leads:
The guidance of the spirit of Christ.
Don't most Christians right for their countries? For the first three hundred years of Christianity almost no Christians fought. They explained that because of their faith, they could no longer fight in wars. Origen wrote:
Athanasius wrote:
If applied, these criteria would certainly reduce the horror of war. In modem times, no war passes the Eighth test: many more civilians than soldiers have died in each of the wars of this century. It is, however, doubtful that the "just war theory" is ever used in the real world. What church has used these tests in a real war, found it unjust and then refused to allow their membership to fight? The real problem with the "just war theory" is that it is all too easy to rationalize our own "justice" and to demonize our "enemy." Even though many other Christians go to war, the peace churches (Friends, Mennonites and Brethren) believe that does not make it right for us to do so. Should apolitical theory like "just war" be more important to Christians than the teaching of Jesus in the Bible?
See also Daniel 2:44-45; Zechariah 9:9-10; Revelation 21:1-4 and Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:2-7; 11:1-9; 65:17-25. many of these prophecies are connected with the coming Messiah, whom Christians recognize as Jesus. "He will be called ... Prince of Peace" (Isaiah 9:6).
2. The presence of God's kingdom. The early church understood that beginning with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost they were living in "the last days" (Acts 2:16ff, 1 John 2:18) when the prophecies of peace were to be fulfilled. One early Christian, Justin, quoted Micah 4:2,3 and then wrote:
It was, of course, central to Jesus' teaching, that "the kingdom of God is within [or among] you" (Luke 17:21).The reconciling ways of Jesus' followers was one of the signs of the Kingdom (Matthew 6:9-15).
3. "Wars and rumors of wars." Jesus acknowledged that "you will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but," he said, "see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come... Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved." (Mt 24:6,12,13). Part of standing firm is following his instructions: You have heard that it was said, "love your neighbor and hate your enemy." But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be [children] of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous ... Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. (Mt 5:43ff)
4. The way of the cross. This command to love enemies is simply to follow Jesus' way of the cross, as he commanded we do (Luke 9:23ff). Just as God loved us, even when we were sinners (Romans 5:8f), so we must love others (1 John 4:7-21). Love of enemies and the willingness to accept, rather than inflict, suffering is an essential sign of the presence of the Spirit of Christ (Romans 8:9-17; 12; 2 Corinthians 5: 16-6: 10; Ephesians 2:11-18; Philippians 2:5-1 1; 3:17-21; 1 Peter 4:12-19) Again and again, Jesus warned that he would have to suffer. He refused the temptation to seize political power (Matthew 4:8- 10) and withdrew from his followers when -they wanted to make him king by force (John 6:15). When Jesus was arrested, Peter started to defend him, but Jesus said, "Put your sword away!" (John 18:1 1).
5. Liberation from oppression.
When Pharaoh's army had cornered the fleeing Hebrews at the Sea of Reeds, the people were terrified:
The essence of Old Testament teaching on war is
that God fights on behalf of the oppressed. The people are not to fight
(c.f., Zechariah 4:6; 2 Kings 8:6ff). In fact, when the people were too
strong, God would not work (Judges 7:2ff). 6. The new covenant: toward a spiritual understanding
of the Kingdom. It is true that there are many texts in the Old
Testament in which God is shown ordering the people into battle. God!s
goal was the establishment of the Kingdom of God as a nation which God
would rule directly, under the charismatic leadership of the Judges. When
the people of Israel asked for a king, "such as all the other nations
have," the prophettoldthem that they were choosing againstgod, and
thatthey would suffer under the ldng's militarism (I Samuel 8). They were
repeatedly warned not to trust in military strength (Psalm 146; 33:17ff).
The books of 1 st and 2nd Kings recount the failure of this attempt to
establish the Kingdom of God as a political state. 7. Spiritual warfare. Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but
against the rulers, against the authorities , against the powers of this
dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes,
you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything,
to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your
waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet
fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. in addition
to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish
all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and
sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. And pray in the Spirit
on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. 8. "Bible prophecy" about Armageddon. In the Book of Revelation "Mystery Babylon" is destroyed (17:1-18) at the battle of Armageddon (16:16). "Mystery Babylon" is a way of describing the spiritual evil of greed and political pride (18:1-24). Over the centuries this "mystery" has been identified by some with the Roman Empire, the Catholic Church, more recently the Soviet Union, Iran and now Saddam Hussein. The mistake is to think that by destroying a social entity one defeats evil itself The Bible clearly teaches that evil is not just "out there;" evil is inward (Mark 7:15) and is in all of us (1 John 1:8-10). Those who welcome war in the Middle East because they think it will lead to God's victory in the battle of Armageddon have misunderstood Biblical prophecy. According to the Book of Revelation, the victory of God is not accomplished with military might, but by "the Word of God" with a "sword that came out of the mouth" (Revelation 19:13,21). It is risky to claim to know when the final judgment of God will be-something even Jesus said he did not know (Matthew 24:36). In fact, Jesus explicitly warned against engaging in this sort of speculation (Acts 1:7). We may (or may not) be living in the final days of history. What the Book of Revelation does tell us is that those who are faithful to Christ's way of the cross will be saved (Revelation 2-3) and that, in the end, God's way is victorious. Practical questions about pacifism:
Does that mean we just let the enemy take over? 'No." Pacifism is not being passive. The early Quaker pacifists saw themselves as involved in the Lamb's War, and aggressively sought out injustice and oppression in order to confront Their evangelism had a strongly prophetic aspect-and they believed that the suffering they experienced was a part of the spiritual war. The history of the Christian church demonstrates that the freedom Christ gives cannot be taken away by political repression. The church has flourished under oppression, from the time of the Roman Emperors to the contemporary experience in China and the Soviet Union. In Quaker experience, it is true that "the cross is the power of God" (I Corinthians 1:92:16). There are countless stories of how unarmed Quakers have been saved from attack during the French and Indian Wars, from robbery and from pirates. (11) There is also a rich tradition, extending back to before the time of Christ, of nonviolent resistance to aggression and dictatorship. During the second world war, there were important examples of successful nonviolent resistance to Hitler's plans to exterminate Jews in Denmark and Norway. In recent years, we have seen nonviolent people's movements overthrow dictatorships in the Philippines, Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary. (12) Nonviolent resistance is not always successful. Of course, neither is military resistance. In the end, a Christian cannot decide how to act on the basis of effectiveness, for the ultimate question is, "what is the will of God?" Thomas Chalkey, a Quaker minister, sailed from Philadelphia in 1707 on a ship owned by a Friend. He wrote in his Journal about what happened when a "privateer" (a privately owned ship authorized by the French government to capture English ships) chased them:
The greatest support any country can receive from its citizens is their efforts to bring their country into the will of God. The twin principles of freedom of religion and freedom of speech enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution are essential to the greatness of the United States. These freedoms are only preserved when they are used. The Congress has acknowledged the legitimacy and importance of the pacifist witness by writing into the Selective Service Act, provisions for those who are conscientious objectors to war to perform civilian alternative service.
What if a bully hits me or someone attacks my family? Under stress, people experience physical changes, the most serious consequence of which is that blood is diverted from their brains to their arms and legs. This is to prepare our bodies for "fight or flight:" the natural response to danger. Through the grace of the Holy Spirit, we hope in such situations, to find ways to act more like human beings who can make choices, rather than be trapped by instinct. The goal is to be neither "victim" nor "executioner." Aggressors expect (indeed, want) their victim to either fight or run. When Jesus counseled, "turn the other cheek" and "walk the extra mile," (Matthew 5:38ff) he was giving examples of how people could take a transforming initiative to humanize situations of oppression so that negotiation and reconciliation become possible. (14) A regular discipline of personal prayer, and forgiveness (initiating truthful dialogue in hope of reconciliation with those who have hurt us), prepares us to be "peacemakers." It is surprising what happens in times of conflict, when one pauses to breathe, pray, and look one's enemy in the eye with courage and love. God can move to change the situation in response to even a wordless prayer, as one holds an adversary in the Light of Christ. Christian pacifism is neither cowardice nor passivity. Jesus expressed anger and even used force in a way that did not hurt others (Mark 11: 12-17). The point is not to be legalistic, but to live in the spirit of creativity which leads to reconciliation.
What about the police? Pacifism is a belief in settling disputes by peaceful means and rejection of the organized killing involved in warfare. Pacifists will draw the line at the use of force at different places. Many, pacifists, for instance, believe that civilian police forces are legitimate in using force to control criminals. The difference is that the goal and motivation of police training and practice is to minimize the violence, protect life and avoid injury to innocent bystanders, whereas military action is much less discriminate, and tactically concentrates on killing people who have been designated as "the enemy."
Am l betraying family members/friends who are in the military? Those who join the military, disrupt their lives and risk dying for their country are to be honored for their courage. Many of the first generation of Friends were soldiers in Cromwell's New Model Army before they came to believe that Christ called them to a different, spiritual warfare. The witness of pacifism can be misunderstood as a rejection of others who have chosen a different course. Even where there are strong differences of opinion about the correct course of action, Christian pacifists hope that their lives will be so marked by the loving Spirit of Christ that relationships will remain unbroken.
If I hunt can I be a pacifist? Pacifists recognize that there is a natural cycle of life and death, by which plants and animals live off of lower forms of life. Hunting for food (and indeed, eating meat at all) is consistent with this kind of life. Some pacifists believe that the slaughter of animals for pleasure and the wanton destruction of the environment is wrong. Pacifism is defined as rejection of war, and does not necessarily imply the rejection of any kind of force or violence.
PART II: What if there
is a draft? Selective Service System regulations are quite complex, and have been rewritten since the last draft during the Vietnam War so it is impossible to know exactly how they will work in practice. What follows is a simplified explanation. It is important that draftees seek out and receive qualified draft counseling. Many Yearly Meeting offices and offices of the American Friends Service Committee know of local draft counselors. You can contact Friends United Meeting, 317-962-7573, or one of the draft counseling agencies listed in note (15) for a referral.
1. Draft registration: All male citizens of the United States are required by U.S. law to register for the draft within 30 days of their 18th birthday. Some Friends have felt compelled by conscience to refuse to participate in the conscription system. The penalty for failing to register can be up to six years in jail and/or a substantial fine. Of the thousands of non-registrants since 1980, only 20 have been prosecuted. Non-registrants have had to serve months in jail, perform up to two years community service and pay substantial fines. Government guaranteed student loans , Federal civil service jobs and job training are denied to those who fail to register. Several Quaker and other colleges make special assistance available to conscientious objectors to registration. Contact admissions offices for information.
2. The draft. If Congress were to pass a law authorizing the Selective Service System (SSS) to conduct a draft, and if the President were to order the induction of a certain number of draftees, this is what would happen. The SSS would hold a lottery to assign a random number to every day of each "Age selection group." Those in the "Age 20 selection group" would be called up first, in the order of their lottery number. (In 1991, the "Age 20 selection group is everyone born in 1971.) If the number of inductees needed exceeded those available in the "age 20 selection group," SS S would call up the next older age groups in order, up to age 25. (Example: if there was a call up in 1991 and the lottery assigned # 1 to March 2, then all those born on March 2, 1971 would be the first to receive induction notices. If the President asked for 100,000 inductions, it is estimated that the SSS would need to send induction orders to lottery #s 1 through 55.)
3. Deferments Classification of any sort (including conscientious objection) does not begin until th draftee has received an induction order. The registrant will receive an order to report a Military Entrance Processing Station. Only during the period between receiving the induction order and the actual reporting date given by the induction order -- which could be as little as ten days -- is the registrant allowed to make claims for reclassification. (Registrants who realize on the day of induction--or after they are in the military--that they are conscientious objectors may file CO claims.) In order to request a reclassification, the registrant should submit a Form 9, Claim for Postponement or Reclassification, using the Information for Registrants booklet These will be available from area SSS offices and possibly from the post office. The Information for Registrants booklet is available to all registrants in advance through: Consumer Information Center Registrants should use Form 9 to make all claims that they could possibly use, as SSS considers that registrants waive any claim to classifications that they have not claimed prior to their induction. There are twenty-one possible classifications. If you are not exempt because of being an "alien" or from current or previous military service, the most likely claims for deferment or exemption are: a) Mentally, physically or morally unacceptable. SSS expects that 50% of inductees will be in this group. If you have a medical or psychiatric record you may fail the military physical examination. You will need a doctor's letter. Homosexuals (who are willing to 'come out") are considered to be disqualified for military service. If you have a police record you may be reclassified as morally unacceptable. b) Hardship to dependents. If you provide sole and irreplaceable support to a dependent, you may qualify for a deferment c) Ministers may be reclassified and ministerial students may be deferred until their schooling is completed. d) Surviving family member. If your father, mother, or one or more of your sisters or brothers was killed as a result of military duty or is a prisoner of war or missing in action, you may be reclassified. e) Conscientious objector to military service, or conscientious objector to combatant military service. Each claim requires different documentation. A draft counselor should be consulted about procedures.
4. Conscientious Objection Section 6(j) of the Military Selective Service Act states:
The key phrases in the legal definition of conscientious
objection are highlighted. One does not need to belong to any particular
religion, or even to any religion at all, to qualify. It is necessary
to be able to show that you sincerely hold beliefs that are like a religion
to you, and that -- as a result of your beliefs -- you would refuse to
participate in any war in which you would reasonably be expected to fight. Form 22 asks the registrant to indicate whether the claim is for class 1-A-0, (noncombatant member of the Armed Forces) or for class 1-0 (exemption from all military service.) The form says:
The Form then asks the following questions:
Because of the speed with which these events could happen, all potential draftees should immediately start to gather support materials. Key elements in a support file are:
The claimant will be given a 20 minute hearing before a Local Claims Board. The registrant can choose up to three supporting witnesses (at least one of which should be a professional-pastor, teacher, doctor, and an advisor such as the claimants draft counselor). There is an appeals procedure, if the claim is denied.
If the Board approves the claim, the inductee will be classified I -W and will be issued an Order to Perform Alternative Service for a two year period. This work must be with a nonprofit organization in the areas of health, education, social services, agriculture, or with a government agency. The SSS will have a list of approved jobs, but the conscientious objector can find an employer, if the job fits the legal requirements. This should be arranged in advance. In the past, many conscientious objectors have performed their alternative service through the Quaker, Mennonite and Brethren voluntary service programs. There are many such programs. In addition to Friends United Meeting, you may wish to contact: Mennonite Central Committee--Voluntary Service Brethren Volunteer Service
Addendum: What about paying military taxes? In addition to the question of direct military service, Friends win want to consider whether they are free in conscience to pay taxes for military purposes. The U.S. Peace Tax Fund Bill, currently before Congress, provides for conscientious objection to paying military taxes. If it were enacted, conscientious objectors could pay their taxes in full and the military portion would be designated for peaceful purposes. (16) The Handbook on Military Taxes & Conscience, edited by Linda B. Coffin for the Friends committee on War Tax Concerns, (available from the National Campaign for a Peace Tax Fund) details the Quaker history and practicalities of this witness. Friends United Meeting maintains a Peace Tax Fund to hold military taxes of Friends who are conscientious objectors to paying for war preparations.
Notes
2. Samuel Janney, Life of William Penn (1852), in London Yearly Meeting, Christian faith aad Practice in the experience of the Society of Friends, 1960, selection 40. (back) 3. The Journal of George Fox, edited by John L. Nickalls, London:Religious Society of Friends, 1975, pp. 399-400. (back) 4. The doctrine of the universal light is explained in Joseph John Gurney, "Addendum on The Light," in A Peculiar People, Friends United Press, 1979 (first published in 1934), pp. 49-67, and in Robert Barclay, "Proposition 5 & 6," in Barclay's Apology in Modern English, edited by Dean Freiday, 1967 (first published in 1678), pp. 72-124. (back) 5. Origen, Contra Celsum, V, 33, quoted in Jean-Michel Homus, It is Not Lawful for Me to Fight: Early Attitudes Toward War, Violence, and the State, translated by Alan Kreider and Oliver Coberun, Herald Press, 1980, pp. 86-87. (back) 6. Athanasius, De Incarnatione Verbi, 52, 4-6, quoted ibid., pp. 88-89. (back) 7. U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops, "The Pastoral Letter on War and Peace: God's Promise and Our Response," 1983, I,3. (back) 8. All Bible quotations are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION, c. 1973, 1978 by the International Bible Society, used by permission of Zondervan Bible Publishers. (back) 9. "First Apology of Justin," (39) in Early Christian Fathers, translated and edited by Cyril C. Richardson, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1970, p. 266. (back) 10. See, "The Lamb's War" (1658), in Early Quaker Writings: 1650-1700, edited by Hugh Barbour and Arthur 0. Roberts, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Cornpany, 1973, pp.107,114. (back) 11. L. Violet Hodgkin, Fierce Feathers and Other Stories, London: Friends Home Service Committee, 1965, (35 pages); The Friendly Story Caravan, Pendle Hill Publications, 1990, (112 pages); and Daisy Newman, A Procession of Friends, Friends United Press, 1972, 1980, (460 pages); are treasuries of these sorts of stories. (back) 12. See Gene Sharp, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, Porter Sargent Publishers, 1973, for the theory of nonviolent political power with many case studies and Ronald J. Sider, Non Violence: The Invincible Weapon?, Word Publishing, 1989, for a moving account of recent cases. (back) 13. "Journal of Thomas Chalkey," in The Friends' Library, Vol. VI, Philadelphia, 1842, p.22. (back) 14. This understanding of Jesus' teaching is from Walter Wink, Violence and Nonviolence in South Africa: Jesus' Third Way, New Society Publishers, 1987, Chapter Two "Jesus' Third Way." (back) 15. This section is based on information from NISBCO (The National Interreligious Service Board for Conscientious Objectors), and CCCO (The Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors). Both organizations provide excellent materials and counseling. The Handbook for Conscientious Objectors, (200 pages) from CCCO is an indispensable resource for conscientious objectors. The most thorough resource for draft counselors is Charles A. Maresca, Jr., NISBCO Draft Counselor's Manual, 5th Ed., 1990. NISBCO CCCO
Copies of this pamphlet are available from the World Ministries Commission of Friends United Meeting for $.50 each. Call 765-962-7573.
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
Copyright
© 2006 by Friends United Meeting. info@fum.org
|